Comments on: Character or Show? /2009/09/character-or-show/ Theatre Information Fri, 18 Jul 2014 23:55:37 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ty Unglebower /2009/09/character-or-show/#comment-51 Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:29:52 +0000 http://www.showbizradio.net/?p=4170#comment-51 Thank you both for your comments. (Belated as my response may be to them.) I am glad you enjoy reading my work, even if you do not agree with my approach to the craft. Indeed, I feel that is the strength of the craft, that there are so many options to arrive at the same place.

]]> By: Bill Aitken /2009/09/character-or-show/#comment-50 Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:25:58 +0000 http://www.showbizradio.net/?p=4170#comment-50 Ty I can see why we disagreed before. we come total oppisite ends of the spectrum when it comes to acting.

But I do like reading your stuff.

Bill

]]> By: Dave Bayles /2009/09/character-or-show/#comment-49 Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:27:19 +0000 http://www.showbizradio.net/?p=4170#comment-49 Bravo Ty, well put and said. The actor, I believe should be dedicated to both their character and the play/production as well. Giving 110% to both. The production falters if the character faulters. Recently I completed directing “Dearly Departed” for the Port Tobacco Players. One thing I told the actors was that the production will not be believable and will fall flat if the character they are portraying is not believable. Be the character, live the character and tell your story even if you are only in one scene with no lines. Your character comes alive and then the whole productiuon comes alive and the audience is transported into the “real world” of the characters within the production.

]]>